Viral DRM, LLC v. Paul Duane Beauregard

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaNovember 27, 20232:23-cv-06398California236 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No. CV 23-06398-SPG(AJRx) Date November 27, 2023

Title Viral DRM, LLC v. Paul Duane Beauregard

Present: The Honorable SHERILYN PEACE GARNETT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Patricia Gomez Not Reported Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder

Attorneys Present for Plaintiff: Attorneys Present for Defendants:

Not Present Not Present

Proceeding: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER Plaintiff(s) are ORDERED to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Link v. Wabash R. Co., 370 U.S. 626 (1962) (Court has inherent power to dismiss for lack of prosecution on its own motion).

The below time period has not been met. Accordingly, the Court, on its own motion, orders Plaintiff to show cause, in writing, on or before December 13, 2023, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. This matter will stand submitted upon the filing of Plaintiff’s response. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78. Failure to respond will be deemed consent to the dismissal of the action.

Plaintiff(s) obtained entry of default as to Defendant Paul Duane Beauregard, pursuant to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.