Securities and Exchange Commission v. John Mark Marino

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaNovember 28, 20232:23-cv-00403California5,048 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE Case No. 2:23-cv-00403 CAS(MAR)

COMMISSION,

13 Plaintiff, STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER1 vs. JOHN MARK MARINO, JASON “JAI” JOHNSON, ABRAHAM BORENSTEIN, AND ANTHONY

BROWN,

18 Defendants. 19 20 1. A. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, proprietary or private information for which special protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the Court to enter the 26 27 1 This Stipulated Protective Order is based substantially on the model protective following Stipulated Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to discovery and that the protection it affords from public disclosure and use extends only to the limited information or items that are…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.