Jae S. Nah v. Andrew V. Jablon

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaNovember 30, 20232:23-cv-06909California553 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JS6

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Case No. 2:23-cv-06909-RGK-RAO Date November 30, 2023 Title Jae §. Nah v. Andrew V. Jabion et al.

Present: The Honorable R.GARY KLAUSNER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Joseph Remigio Not Reported N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Tape No. Attorneys Present for Plaintiff: Attorneys Present for Defendants: Not Present Not Present Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) Order Re: Vexatious Litigant On August 22, 2023, Jae S. Nah (“Plaintiff”) filed a Complaint against Defendants. (ECF No. 1.) On November 2, 2023, the Court dismissed the Complaint in its entirety with prejudice and ordered Plaintiff to show cause in writing why he should not be declared a vexatious litigant. (ECF No. 66.) On November 27, 2023, Plaintiff responded.! (ECF No. 71.) Plaintiff argues that he should not be declared a vexatious litigant because: (1) the two prior federal cases were dismissed without prejudice, and he apparently meant to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.