Malik Aaron v. Target Corporation
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 1, 20232:22-cv-01237California10,624 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
1 O
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case No.: 2:22-cv-01237-MEMF-JPR MALIK AARON, an individual, GREGORY
KIM, a minor, by and through his guardian ad
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT TARGET
litem, Angel Rufuerzo, CORPORATION [ECF NOS. 49, 52] AND Plaintiffs, GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANT COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, RAFAEL v. MEJIA, AND MICHAEL RUSSELL’S [ECF
NO. 50, 56] MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT TARGET CORPORATION, a Minnesota corporation; COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, a public entity; VINCENT KRUSE, an 18 individual; RAFAEL MEJIA, an individual; MICHAEL RUSSELL, and individual; and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, 20 Defendants. 21 22 Before the Court are the Motions for Summary Judgment or, in the Alternative, Partial Summary Judgment (the “Motions”) filed by (1) Defendant Target Corporation (“Target”); and (2) County of Los Angeles (the “County”), Rafael Mejia, and Michael Russell (collectively, the “County Defendants”). ECF…