Malik Aaron v. Target Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 1, 20232:22-cv-01237California10,624 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

1 O

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case No.: 2:22-cv-01237-MEMF-JPR MALIK AARON, an individual, GREGORY

KIM, a minor, by and through his guardian ad

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT TARGET

litem, Angel Rufuerzo, CORPORATION [ECF NOS. 49, 52] AND Plaintiffs, GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANT COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, RAFAEL v. MEJIA, AND MICHAEL RUSSELL’S [ECF

NO. 50, 56] MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT TARGET CORPORATION, a Minnesota corporation; COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, a public entity; VINCENT KRUSE, an 18 individual; RAFAEL MEJIA, an individual; MICHAEL RUSSELL, and individual; and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, 20 Defendants. 21 22 Before the Court are the Motions for Summary Judgment or, in the Alternative, Partial Summary Judgment (the “Motions”) filed by (1) Defendant Target Corporation (“Target”); and (2) County of Los Angeles (the “County”), Rafael Mejia, and Michael Russell (collectively, the “County Defendants”). ECF…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.