Jose J. Mireles v. General Motors LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaNovember 30, 20235:23-cv-01717California1,778 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

I. BACKGROUND

25 This case arises out of Mireles’ purchase of a 2019 Chevrolet Bolt. [Dkt. 26 1-1 at 4]. Mireles claims he brought the Bolt new and that, after purchase, the 27 Bolt began to exhibit “defects, non-conformities, … , [and] malfunctions” in violation of GM’s express and implied warranties. Id. at 5 and 10. Mireles filed this action on July 27, 2023, asserting three causes of action under the Song- Beverly Act, one for fraud, and one for violation of California’s Business & Professions Code § 17200. [Dkt. 1 at 2]. GM removed this action to this Court on August 23, 2023. [Dkt. 1]. Importantly, the suggested retail price for a 2019 Chevrolet Bolt is $38,639. Id. at 4. In his Complaint, Mireles seeks a variety of remedies including “rescission of the purchase contract,” a “civil penalty in the amount of two times Plaintiff’s actual, incidental, and consequential damages,” and “for restitution of all monies expended.” [Dkt. 1-1 at 20]. II. STATEMENT OF LAW Federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of Am., 511 U.S. 375, 377 (1994). Thus, federal courts can only…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.