Mohammad Moayery v. State Farm General Insurance Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaNovember 30, 20232:22-cv-09261California6,596 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

O

4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 MOHAMMAD MOAYERY, an individual, Case No.: 2:22-cv-09261-MEMF-(Ex) 13 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

v. [ECF NO. 23]

STATE FARM GENERAL INSURANCE

COMPANY, an Illinois corporation; and Does 1 through 100, inclusive, 17 Defendants.

20 21 Before the Court is the Motion for Summary Judgment (the “Motion”) filed by Defendant State Farm General Insurance Company (“Defendant” or “State Farm”). For the reasons stated herein, the Court hereby DENIES the Motion for Summary Judgment. / / / / / / / / / / / / I. Background A. Factual Background1 Plaintiff Mohammad Moayery (“Moayery” or “Plaintiff”) owns real property located at 3715 Oakfield Drive, Sherman Oaks, California. FAC ¶ 1. Moayery alleges that his property suffered property damage and his insurance company, State Farm, wrongfully denied his…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.