Veronica Isabel Aguilar Herrera v. Swift Beef Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 5, 20235:23-cv-01903California784 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

CUENNTITREADL S DTIASTTERSIC DTI SOTFR CICATL ICFOOURRNTIA

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Case No. EDCV 23-1903-GW-SPx Date December 5, 2023 Title Veronica Isabel Aguilar Herrera v. Swift Beef Company, et al.

Present: The Honorable GEORGE H. WU, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Javier Gonzalez None Present Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Tape No. Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendants: None Present None Present

PROCEEDINGS (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER DENYING MOTION TO REMAND;

VACATING HEARING ON MOTION

Despite the fact that she did not file a Reply brief – and, consequently, presented no response to reliance on Curtis v. Irwin Industries, Inc., 913 F.3d 1146 (9th Cir. 2019), a centerpiece of the Opposition brief’s efforts to explain why subject matter jurisdiction existed in the case – in connection with the original hearing date set for her motion to remand, the Court gave Plaintiff Veronica Isabel Aguilar Herrera (“Plaintiff”) an opportunity to file a brief after that hearing. See Docket No. 24. Having now responded to the Opposition filed by defendant Swift Beef Company (“Swift”)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.