Volodymyr Braychenko v. Vladimir A. Rodinoff

O

2 3 4 5 6

United States District Court Central District of California

11 VOLODYMYR BRAYCHENKO, Case № 2:23-cv-05607-ODW (MARx)

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S

v.

MOTION TO DISMISS [11]

14 VLADIMIR A. RODINOFF,

15 Defendant.

16 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Volodymyr Braychenko brings this action against Defendant Vlad 19 Rodinoff for breach of contract. (Notice of Removal Ex. 1 (“Compl.”), ECF No. 1.) 20 Rodinoff now moves to dismiss this action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 21 Procedure (“Rule”) 12(b)(2) and 12(b)(6). (Mot. Dismiss (“Motion” or “Mot.”), ECF 22 No. 11.) For the following reasons, the Court DENIES Defendant’s Motion.1 II. BACKGROUND The following facts are taken from Braychenko’s Complaint. See Ashcroft v. 25 Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (stating that well-pleaded factual allegations are 26 accepted as true for purposes of a motion to dismiss).

28 1 Having carefully considered the papers filed in connection with the Motion, the Court deemed the matter…