Tayler Ortiz-Dixon v. FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 7, 20235:23-cv-01140California3,405 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

O

2 3 4 5 6

United States District Court Central District of California

11 TAYLER ORTIZ-DIXON et al., Case No. 5:23-cv-01140-ODW (SPx)

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

v. REMAND [15]; AND GRANTING STIPULATION TO STAY CASE [25]

FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE

15 SYSTEM, INC. et al., Defendants. I. INTRODUCTION On February 27, 2023, Plaintiff Tayler Ortiz-Dixon filed this putative Class 19 Action Complaint in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of San 20 Bernardino, against her employer, Defendant FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. 21 (Notice of Removal (“NOR”) Ex. A (“Compl.”), ECF No. 1.) On June 14, 2023, 22 FedEx removed the instant action on the basis that this Court has jurisdiction under 23 the Class Action Fairness Act (“CAFA”), U.S.C. § 1332(d). (NOR ¶ 8.) 24 Ortiz-Dixon now moves to remand this action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. 25 (Mot. Remand (“Motion” or “Mot.”), ECF No. 15.) For the reasons below, the Court 26…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.