Brittany Ann Ingrassi v. State of California

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 7, 20232:22-cv-05988California604 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BRITTANY ANN INGRASSI, C ase No. CV 22-5988 SPG (PVC)

Petitioner, ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED

v. STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND

OVERRULING OBJECTIONS

JENNIFER CORE, Warden,

Respondent.

17 18 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. The Court has engaged in de novo review of those portions of the Report to which Petitioner and Respondent have objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge and overrules the objections. Notwithstanding this Court’s acceptance of the Report, the Court addresses the following objections raised by Petitioner. Within Petitioner’s Grounds One and Two, Petitioner presented an argument that she was not permitted to fire her retained…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.