Anthony Amirikhass v. Walmart Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 8, 20232:23-cv-02088California225 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Case No. CV 23-2088 FMO (MRWx) Date December 8, 2023 Title Amirikhass v. Walmart

Present: The Honorable Michael R. Wilner James Muñoz n/a Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Attorneys Present for Plaintiff: Attorneys Present for Defendant: None present None present Proceedings: ORDER RE: PROTECTIVE ORDER

The parties submitted a proposed protective order regarding discovery in this civil action. (Docket # 26.) The Court accepts and ENTERS the proposed order subject to the following: 1. ¶ 20 – Any challenge to a confidentiality designation must comply in full with the joint filing format described in Local Rule 37 for all discovery motions. 2. ¶ 24 – The “Manner of Sealing” provision is struck in its entirety. Sealed filings will comply with the procedures set forth in Local Rule 79. 3. The parties failed to provide the Court with an adequate statement of good cause regarding the litigation. See Oliner v. Kontrabecki, 745 F. 3d 1024, 1026 (9th Cir. 2014). As stated in the Court’s preferred proposed protective order…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.