Philip Markowitz v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 11, 20232:23-cv-06528California2,238 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

O

2 3 4 5 6

United States District Court Central District of California

11 Philip Markowitz, Case № 2:23-cv-06528-ODW (MRWx)

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT

v.

CLAIRE DAWSON’S MOTION TO

14 JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al., DISMISS FOR LACK OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION [17] Defendants.

16 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Philip Markowitz brings this action against Defendants JPMorgan 19 Chase Bank, N.A. and Claire Dawson for the alleged improper retention of funds in 20 Markowitz’s bank accounts. (Notice of Removal Ex. 1 (“Compl.”), ECF No. 1-1.) 21 Dawson now moves to be dismissed from this action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 22 Procedure (“Rule”) 12(b)(2) for lack of personal jurisdiction. (Mot. Dismiss 23 (“Motion” or “Mot.”), ECF No. 17.) For the reasons discussed below, the Court 24 GRANTS Dawson’s Motion.1 25 26

28 1 Having carefully considered the papers filed in connection with the Motion, the Court deemed the matter appropriate for decision without oral argument. Fed.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.