Victor Santago Rivera v. Martin O'Malley

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 7, 20232:22-cv-09093California749 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 VICTOR S. R., Case No. 2:22-cv-09093-HDV (E)

Plaintiff, ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND v. RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED

STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, 15 Defendant.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the pleadings, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation (“Report”) of the United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which objections have been made. The Report recommends that the Commissioner’s decision denying disability benefits be reversed in part and that this case be remanded for further administrative proceedings. (ECF No. 27.) Specifically, the Report found that the Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) erred in assessing whether Plaintiff’s alleged carpal tunnel syndrome was severe, and that the error was not harmless. (Id. at 4, 7.) Defendant’s Objections…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.