Yuri Doering v. Mariscos Mi Lindo Sinaloa, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 YURI DOERING, No. 2:23-cv-10219-JAK (RAOx) 11 Plaintiff, ORDER RE TO SHOW CAUSE RE: SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION v. OVER STATE-LAW CLAIMS
MARISCOS MI LINDO SINALOA, INC.
D/B/A MARISCOS MI LINDO
SINALOA & SPORTS BAR; VIEN
TRAN; and DOES 1 to 10, Defendants. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Based on a review of the Complaint (Dkt. 1), the following determinations are made: The Complaint alleges violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101 et seq. (the “ADA”), the Unruh Civil Rights Act (the “Unruh Act”), Cal. Civ. Code §§ 51-53, and other provisions of California law. Supplemental jurisdiction is the basis for the state-law claims. Dkt. 1 ¶ 7. District courts may exercise “supplemental jurisdiction over all other claims that are so related to claims in the action within such original jurisdiction that they form part of the same case or controversy under…