Eric Ray Malone v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 12, 20235:23-cv-00580California573 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JS-

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES—GENERAL

Case No. EDCV 23-0580 JGB (SPx) Date December 12, 2023 Title Eric Ray Malone v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, et al.

Present: The Honorable JESUS G. BERNAL, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

MAYNOR GALVEZ Not Reported Deputy Clerk Court Reporter

Attorney(s) Present for Plaintiff(s): Attorney(s) Present for Defendant(s): None Present None Present

Proceedings: Order (1) DISMISSING Plaintiff’s Complaint for Failure to Prosecute; and (2) DIRECTING the Clerk to Close the Case (IN CHAMBERS)

On April 3, 2023, Plaintiff Eric Ray Malone (“Plaintiff”) filed a complaint against Defendants State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Eric Reichert, Oscar Santos, and Cindy Peiper (collectively, “Defendants”). (“Complaint,” Dkt. No. 1.) On December 1, 2023, the Court ordered Plaintiff to show in cause in writing by December 11, 2023 why the action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. (“OSC,” Dkt. No. 10.) As the Court noted in its OSC, proof of service has not been filed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.