Cristina Zavalza v. Walmart Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
O
JS-
2 3 4 5 6
United States District Court Central District of California
11 CRISTINA ZAVALZA, Case № 2:23-cv-08198-ODW (SKx)
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO
v.
REMAND [10]
14 WALMART INC. et al.,
15 Defendants.
16 I. INTRODUCTION & BACKGROUND Before the Court is Plaintiff Cristina Zavalza’s Motion to Remand. (Mot., ECF 19 No. 10.) Finding Defendant Walmart Inc.’s removal untimely, the Court GRANTS 20 the Motion and remands the case.1 On June 21, 2022, Zavalza initiated this action against Walmart in Los Angeles 22 County Superior Court, asserting negligence and premises liability based on injuries 23 she allegedly sustained on Walmart’s premises. (Notice of Removal (“NOR”) Ex. 1 24 (“Compl.”), ECF No. 1-1.) On June 26, 2023, Plaintiff served Walmart with the 25 Summons, Complaint, and an initial Statement of Damages. (Decl. Allan L. Dollison 26 ISO Mot. (“Dollison Decl.”) ¶ 14, Ex. C, ECF Nos. 10-2, 10-5.) In the Complaint,
28 1 Having carefully considered the papers filed in connection with the Motion, the Court deemed…