Chase Lee Collins v. William Sullivan

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 18, 20232:19-cv-10807California839 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 Chase Lee Collins, Case No. 2:19-cv-10807-FMO-LAL 7 Petitioner, ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED v. STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 9 William Sullivan, 10 Respondent.

14 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the Magistrate Judge’s 15 Report and Recommendation, Petitioner’s Objections to the Report and Recommendation, and 16 the remaining record, and has made a de novo determination. 17 Petitioner and his co-defendant, Robert Zygo, were convicted in the Los Angeles County 18 Superior Court of second-degree robbery. (ECF No. 43 at 2.) According to the Report, 19 Petitioner either was a direct perpetrator or an aider and abettor of the robbery. (Id. at 15-16.) 20 The crux of Petitioner’s objections is that, under Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 (1979), the 21 evidence was insufficient to convict him of robbery under any theory of liability. (ECF No. 46 at 22 3-4.) For the following reasons, Petitioner’s Objections to the Report do not warrant a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.