Mannal Massoud v. Irene Martin

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 18, 20235:22-cv-01379California569 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES—GENERAL

Case No. EDCV 22-1379 JGB (SHKx) Date December 18, 2023 Title Mannal Massoud v. Irene Martin, et al.

Present: The Honorable JESUS G. BERNAL, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

MAYNOR GALVEZ Not Reported Deputy Clerk Court Reporter

Attorney(s) Present for Plaintiff(s): Attorney(s) Present for Defendant(s): None Present None Present

Proceedings: Order (1) DISMISSING Plaintiff’s Complaint for Failure to Prosecute; and (2) DIRECTING the Clerk to Close the Case (IN CHAMBERS)

On August 4, 2022, Plaintiff Mannal Massoud (“Plaintiff”) filed a writ of mandamus against Defendants Irene Martin, Merrick Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas, and Ur Jaddou (“Defendants”). (“Writ,” Dkt. No. 1.) On December 7, 2023, the Court ordered Plaintiff to show cause in writing by December 15, 2023 why the action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. (“OSC,” Dkt. No. 11.) As the Court noted in its OSC, Defendants had not been served with summons and proof of service within the required time period. (See id.) As of December 18,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.