Steven A. Schuman v. Citibank N.A.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 20, 20232:23-cv-08654California2,888 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

I. Factual and Procedural Background

A. Procedural History Plaintiff Steven A. Schuman (“Plaintiff”) filed this action in the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Los Angeles on August 7, 2023. Compl., ECF No. 1-2. Defendants Citibank, N.A. and Jesse Tyre-Karp (collectively, “Defendants”) removed this action to this federal court on October 13, 2023. ECF No. 1. On October 20, 2023, Defendants filed a motion to dismiss Plaintiff's complaint. ECF No. 10. On November 7, 2023, Plaintiff filed a motion to remand this action back to state court. ECF No. 15. On November 16, 2023, the Court deferred ruling on Defendants’ motion to dismiss until it had ruled on Plaintiff's motion to remand. ECF No. 17.

Initials of Preparer PMC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

No. 2:23-cv-08654-SVW-RAO Date December 20, 2023

Steven A. Schuman v. Citibank N_A. et al. Title

B. Factual Background Plaintiff alleges that he is the owner of a single-family residence commonly known as 1500 North Beverly Drive, Beverly Hills, California 90210 (the “Beverly Hills Property”).…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.