Southern California Emergency Medicine, Inc. v. Daniel Werfel

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 21, 20235:23-cv-02450California629 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Case No. ED CV 23-2450-FMO (DTBx) Date December 21, 2023 Title Southern California Emergency Medicine, Inc. v. Daniel Werfel, et al.

Present: The Honorable Fernando M. Olguin, United States District Judge Vanessa Figueroa None None Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Tape No. Attorney Present for Plaintiff(s): Attorney Present for Defendant(s): None Present None Present Proceedings: (In Chambers) Order to Show Cause Re: Venue On December 1, 2023, plaintiff Southern California Emergency Medicine, Inc. (“plaintiff”) filed a Complaint [] (Dkt. 1, “Complaint’) against defendants. Plaintiff's only allegation regarding venue is that “[vJenue is proper under 28 U.S.C. § 1391(e)(1).” (See id. at J 15). Pursuant to § 1391(e)(1), “[a] civil action in which a defendant is an officer or employee of the United States or any agency thereof acting in his official capacity or under color of legal authority, or an agency of the United …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.