Br Jaun Clinton v. Federal Express Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 20, 20235:23-cv-02354California1,339 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Case No. ED CV 23-2354 FMO (SPx) Date December 20, 2023 Title Br’Jaun Clinton v. Federal Express Corporation, et al.

Present: The Honorable Fernando M. Olguin, United States District Judge Vanessa Figueroa None None Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Tape No. Attorney Present for Plaintiff(s): Attorney Present for Defendant(s): None Present None Present Proceedings: (In Chambers) Order Remanding Action On October 11, 2023, Br’Jaun Clinton (“plaintiff”) filed a Complaint in the San Bernardino County Superior Court against Federal Express Corporation (“Federal Express” or “defendant”), Steven Doe (“Steven”) and Rebecca Doe (“Rebecca”), asserting claims for violations of the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (“FEHA”), Cal. Govt. Code §§ 12940, et seq., wrongful termination in violation of California public policy, and declaratory judgment. (Dkt. 1, Notice of Removal [ ] (“NOR”) at ¶ 2); (Dkt. 1-1, Exh. 1, Complaint). On November 17, 2023, Federal Express removed the action on diversity jurisdiction grounds pursuant to 28…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.