Riyawna Washington v. Target Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 21, 20235:23-cv-01133California1,845 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

JS-6 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RIYAWNA WASHINGTON, Case No. 5:23-cv-01133-FLA (SPx)

Plaintiff,

ORDER REMANDING ACTION FOR

v. LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER

JURISDICTION

14 TARGET CORPORATION, et al., Defendants.

17

19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RULING On May 10, 2023, Plaintiff Riyawna Washington (“Plaintiff”) initiated this action against Defendant Target Corporation (“Defendant”), and DOES 1 through 10 in the San Bernardino County Superior Court. Dkt. 1-1, Ex. A (“Compl.”). The Complaint asserts three state-law claims based on the Fair Employment and Housing Act (“FEHA”), Cal. Gov’t Code § 12940 et seq. Id. On June 14, 2023, Defendant removed the action to this court based on alleged diversity jurisdiction. Dkt. 1 (“NoR”). In its Notice of Removal, Defendant alleges the court has subject matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332 because the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.