Kimberly Frazier v. Egyptian Temple No. 5, Ancient Egyptian Arabic Order Nobles of The Mystic Shrine

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 28, 20232:23-cv-10704California516 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KIMBERLY FRAZIER 2:23−cv−10704−DSF−MRW Plaintiff(s),

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

v.

EGYPTIAN TEMPLE NO. 5, ANCIENT

EGYPTIAN ARABIC ORDER

NOBLES OF THE MYSTIC SHRINE, et al. Defendant(s). The Complaint filed in this action asserts a claim for injunctive relief arising out of an alleged violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12010-12213, and a claim for damages pursuant to California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act (Unruh Act), Cal. Civ. Code §§ 51-53. It appears that the Court possesses only supplemental jurisdiction over the Unruh Act claim, and any other state law claim that plaintiff may have alleged pursuant to the Court’s supplemental jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. § 1367(a). The supplemental jurisdiction statute “reflects the understanding that, when deciding whether to exercise supplemental jurisdiction, 'a federal court should consider and weigh in each case, and at every stage of the litigation, the values of judicial economy, convenience, fairness, and comity.”’ City of Chicago v. Int’l Coll. of Surgeons, 522 U.S. 156, 173 (1997) (emphasis added) (quoting Carnegie-Mellon…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.