Marquise Bailey v. O Connors Lakewood LLC

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 United States District Court 9 Central District of California 10 Western Division 11 12 MARQUISE BAILEY, CV 23-08981 TJH

13 Plaintiff, Order to Show Cause 14 v. 15 O Connors Lakewood LLC, et al., 16 Defendants. 17 18 The Complaint filed in this case alleged a claim for injunctive relief for an 19 alleged violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12010-12213 20 ["ADA"], and a claim for damages pursuant to California's Unruh Civil Rights Act, 21 Cal. Civ. Code §§ 51-53 ["Unruh Act"]. It appears that the Court possesses only 22 supplemental jurisdiction over the Unruh Act claim and any other state law claim that 23 Plaintiff may have alleged, if any. See 28 U.S.C. § 1367(a). 24 Section 1367 "reflects the understanding that, when deciding whether to exercise 25 supplemental jurisdiction, ‘a federal court should consider and weigh in each case, and 26 at every stage of the litigation, the values of judicial economy, convenience, fairness, 27 and comity.'" City of Chicago v. Int'l Coll. of…