Ahmad Raheem Price v. Robert Gell

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 4, 20245:23-cv-00671California1,410 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2

3

4

5

6

7

8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

11 AHMAD RAHEEM PRICE, Case No. 5:23-cv-00671-JLS (GJS) 12 Plaintiff

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION

13 v. WITHOUT PREJUDICE

14 ROBERT GELL, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 On October 27, 2022, Plaintiff filed a civil complaint in Riverside County 19 Superior Court Case No. CVSW2207120 against Ruslan Yeramishyn, Robert Gell, 20 David Holm (“Defendants”), and various “Doe” defendants. [Dkt. 1, Ex. 1.] On 21 March 22, 2023, Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint against the Defendants 22 and eight “Does.” On April 7, 2023, Defendants removed Riverside County 23 Superior Court Case No. CVSW2207120 to this District Court and it was assigned 24 Case No. 5:23-00608-JLS (GJS) (the “23-608 Action”).1 After motion proceedings, 25 on November 20, 2023, Plaintiff was granted leave to file a Second Amended 26 Complaint in the 23-608 Action, and Defendants have been ordered to file a 27 response to the amended pleading. 28 1 On April 13, 2023, six days after the 23-608 Action commenced in this Court, 2 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.