Melanie Delapaz v. Erika Mares

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 4, 20242:23-cv-07615California850 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 | MELANIE DELAPAZ, ) Case No. CV 23-7615 FMO (JCx) 11 Plaintiff, 12 V. ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT ) PREJUDICE 13 || ERIKA MARES, et al., ) 14 Defendants. 15 16 On September 26, 2023, the court issued its Standing Order Re: ADA Accessibility Cases, (see Dkt. 10, Court’s Order of September 26, 2023), which ordered plaintiff to file a request for entry of default no later than seven calendar days after the time the response to the complaint would have been due. (See id. at 2). The court admonished plaintiff that “failure to seek entry 20 | of default within seven . . . days after the deadline to file a response to the complaint shall result in the dismissal of the action and/or the defendant against whom the motion for default judgment should have been filed.” (Id. at 2-3) (citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 629-30, 82 S.Ct. 1386, 1388 (1962)). 24 Here, by stipulation of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.