Guri Gonzalez v. 960 Vine LLC
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 8, 20242:23-cv-07899California1,114 words
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES—GENERAL
Case No. 2:23-cv-07899-HDV (AJRx) Date January 8, 2023
Title Guri Gonzalez v. 960 Vine LLC et al Page 1 of 3
Present: The Honorable HERNÁN D. VERA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
WENDY HERNANDEZ NOT REPORTED
Deputy Clerk Court Reporter
Attorneys Present for Plaintiff(s) Attorneys Present for Defendant(s) None Present None Present
Proceedings: IN CHAMBERS— ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE COURT
SHOULD NOT DECLINE TO EXERCISE SUPPLEMENTAL
JURISDICTION OVER PLAINTIFF’S STATE LAW CLAIMS
The Complaint filed in this action asserts a claim for injunctive relief arising out of an alleged violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12131 et seq., a claim for damages pursuant to California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act (“Unruh Act”), Cal. Civ. Code §§ 51-53, and other claims. It appears that the Court has supplemental jurisdiction over the Unruh Act claim, the California Disabled Persons Act claim, the California Health & Safety Code § 1995, et seq. claim, and the negligence claim. …