Guri Gonzalez v. 960 Vine LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 8, 20242:23-cv-07899California1,114 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES—GENERAL

Case No. 2:23-cv-07899-HDV (AJRx) Date January 8, 2023

Title Guri Gonzalez v. 960 Vine LLC et al Page 1 of 3

Present: The Honorable HERNÁN D. VERA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

WENDY HERNANDEZ NOT REPORTED

Deputy Clerk Court Reporter

Attorneys Present for Plaintiff(s) Attorneys Present for Defendant(s) None Present None Present

Proceedings: IN CHAMBERS— ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE COURT

SHOULD NOT DECLINE TO EXERCISE SUPPLEMENTAL

JURISDICTION OVER PLAINTIFF’S STATE LAW CLAIMS

The Complaint filed in this action asserts a claim for injunctive relief arising out of an alleged violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12131 et seq., a claim for damages pursuant to California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act (“Unruh Act”), Cal. Civ. Code §§ 51-53, and other claims. It appears that the Court has supplemental jurisdiction over the Unruh Act claim, the California Disabled Persons Act claim, the California Health & Safety Code § 1995, et seq. claim, and the negligence claim. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.