Christina Bundy v. Caldera Medical, Inc.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10 CHRISTINA BUNDY, Case No. 2:23-cv-09272-WLH-PVC 11 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S 12 MOTION FOR REMAND [14] 13 v.
14 CALDERA MEDICAL, INC., et al.,
15 Defendants.
16
17
18 No party filed a written request for oral argument stating that an attorney with 19 five years or less of experience would be arguing the matter. See Standing Order for 20 Newly Assigned Civil Cases at 15. Further, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 21 78 and Local Rule 7-15, the Court finds this matter appropriate for decision without 22 oral argument. The hearing calendared for January 12, 2024, is VACATED, and the 23 matter taken off calendar. 24 Before the Court is Plaintiff Christina Bundy’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion for Remand 25 (the “Motion”). (Docket No. 14). No defendant filed an opposition to the Motion. 26 For the reasons stated below, the Court GRANTS the Motion and remands the action 27 to the Superior Court of the State of California, Los Angeles County. 28 1 I. …