Annette Cody v. Harman International Industries, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 9, 20242:23-cv-10845California1,044 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Case No. CV 23-10845 PA (RAOx) Date January 9, 2024 Title Annette Cody v. Harman International Industries, Inc.

Present: The Honorable PERCY ANDERSON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Kamilla Sali-Suleyman Not Reported N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter Tape No. Attorneys Present for Plaintiff: Attorneys Present for Defendant: None None Proceedings: IN CHAMBERS — COURT ORDER

The Court is in receipt of a Notice of Removal filed by defendant Harman International Industries, Inc. (“Defendant”). (Docket No. 1.) The Notice of Removal alleges that the Court possesses jurisdiction over the action filed by plaintiff Annette Cody (“Plaintiff”) pursuant to the Class Action Fairness Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1332(d) (“CAFA”). Federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction, having subject matter jurisdiction only over matters authorized by Congress and the Constitution. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co., 511 U.S. 375, 377 (1994). A…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.