Christopher Prevedello v. County of Los Angeles

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 8, 20242:23-cv-08435California2,923 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

I. INTRODUCTION

On October 6, 2023, plaintiff Christopher Prevedello filed this action against defendants County of Los Angeles (the “County’”’), unidentified deputies, City of Los Angeles (the “City”), and unidentified officers. Dkt. 1. Plaintiff alleges seven claims for relief: (1) failure to protect under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, as against unidentified deputies and unidentified officers; (2) due process—state created danger under 42 U.S.C.§ 1983, as against unidentified deputies and unidentified officers: (3) due process—special relationship under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, as against unidentified deputies and unidentified officers; (4) Monell under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, as against the County and the City; (5) negligence, as against all defendants; (6) Bane Act Violation, Civil Code§ 52.1, as against all defendants; and (7) violation of California’s Public Records Act (the “CPRA”), Cal. Gov’t Code §§ 6250, ef seqg., as against the County. Id. On November 6, 2023, defendant the County filed a motion to dismiss the sixth cause of action in the complaint. Dkt. 14. On November 8, 2023, defendant the City filed an answer. Dkt. 15. On…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.