Bruce Puterbaugh v. Oorah, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 10, 20248:21-cv-01593California1,500 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SOUTHERN DIVISION 11 ) 12 BRUCE PUTERBAUGH, ) Case No.: SACV 21-01593-CJC (DFMx) ) 13 ) ) Plaintiff, 14 ) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ) THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE v. 15 ) REMANDED TO STATE COURT FOR ) LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER 16 OORAH, INC., KARS 4 KIDS INC., ) JURISDICTION ) 17 J.O.Y. OF OUR YOUTH, and DOES 1- ) 10, ) 18 ) ) 19 Defendants. ) ) 20 ) 21 22 In this case, Plaintiff Bruce Puterbaugh alleges that Defendant Kars 4 Kids Inc. 23 violated California’s False Advertising Law (“FAL”) and Unfair Competition Law 24 (“UCL”) because its advertisements suggest that donations benefit needy children of all 25 faiths nationwide, but really donations benefit primarily Orthodox Jewish children in 26 New York and New Jersey. (Dkt. 14 [First Amended Complaint] ¶¶ 11, 21.) 27 1 “Federal courts are…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.