Justin Salmen v. RJDCF Warden

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 10, 20242:21-cv-08652California736 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9 10 11 JUSTIN SALMEN, Case No. 2:21-cv-08652-AB (JPR)

12 Petitioner, ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND v. RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED 13 STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 14 JAMES HILL, Acting Warden, 15 Respondent. 16 17 18 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the other 19 records on file, and the Report and Recommendation (“Report”) of the United 20 States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of 21 those portions of the Report to which objections have been made. 22 The Report recommends denial of the Petition and its supplement and the 23 dismissal of the action with prejudice. (ECF No. 73.) Petitioner has filed 24 objections to the Report. (ECF Nos. 75 and 76.) For the following reasons, 25 Petitioner’s objections do not warrant a change in the Magistrate Judge’s findings 26 or recommendation. 27 Petitioner objects that the prosecutor was “a known framer engaging in 28 perjury to take advantage of the no…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.