Richard Collins v. S. Smith

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 11, 20245:23-cv-02263California491 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

11 RICHARD COLLINS, Case No. 5:23-cv-02263-SB-KES

12 Petitioner,

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND

13 v.

RECOMMENDATION OF

14 S. SMITH, Warden, U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE

15 Respondent.

16

17

18 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition (Dkt. No.

19 1), the other records on file herein, and the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”)

20 of the U.S. Magistrate Judge (Dkt. No. 7). The deadline for filing objections to the 21 R&R passed on December 14, 2023, and no objections were filed. 22 On December 22, 2023, petitioner filed a motion for extension of time to file 23 an appeal, referring to the R&R as a “response and denial” and mailing his motion 24 directly to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Ninth Circuit docketed the 25 motion as a notice of appeal and sent a courtesy copy to this Court. Dkt. No. 9. 26 Based on the filing, it appears that petitioner incorrectly interpreted the R&R as a 27 final decision and requested additional time to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.