Amorepacific Corporation v. Sunshine Mall

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 12, 20242:23-cv-08749California547 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Case No. 2:23-cv-08749-RGK-BFM Date January 12, 2024 Title Amorepacific Corporation, et al. v. Sunshine Mall, et al.

Present: The Honorable R. GARY KLAUSNER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Joseph Remigio Not Reported N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Tape No. Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendants: Not Present Not Present Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) Order to Show Cause Re: Whether Plaintiffs Failed to State an Interference with Contractual Relations Claim On October 17, 2023, Amorepacific Corporation and Amorepacific US, Inc. (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) filed a Complaint against Sunshine Mall and Tae Woong Kim (collectively, “Defendants”’), asserting various federal and state claims stemming from Defendants’ unauthorized import and sale of Plaintiffs’ overseas products. (ECF No. 1.) On December 13, 2023, Defendants filed a motion to dismiss one claim—interference with contractual relations—as…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.