Kyle Handley v. Sean Moore
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 16, 20248:22-cv-01423California884 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
KYLE HANDLEY, Case No. 8:22-cv-01423-MCS-GJS
Petitioner,
ORDER ACCEPTING IN PART
v. AND REJECTING IN PART
FINDINGS AND
SEAN MOORE, RECOMMENDATIONS OF
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE
Respondent. JUDGE 16 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the operative habeas petition, (Pet., ECF No. 1), all relevant documents filed and lodged in this action, the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge, (Report, ECF No. 14), and Petitioner’s Objections to the Report, (Objs., ECF No. 17). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b), the Court has conducted a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which objections have been stated. Having completed its review, the Court accepts in part and rejects in part the findings and recommendations set forth in the Report. Specifically, the Court rejects the Magistrate Judge’s…