Kyle Handley v. Sean Moore

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 16, 20248:22-cv-01423California884 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KYLE HANDLEY, Case No. 8:22-cv-01423-MCS-GJS

Petitioner,

ORDER ACCEPTING IN PART

v. AND REJECTING IN PART

FINDINGS AND

SEAN MOORE, RECOMMENDATIONS OF

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE

Respondent. JUDGE 16 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the operative habeas petition, (Pet., ECF No. 1), all relevant documents filed and lodged in this action, the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge, (Report, ECF No. 14), and Petitioner’s Objections to the Report, (Objs., ECF No. 17). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b), the Court has conducted a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which objections have been stated. Having completed its review, the Court accepts in part and rejects in part the findings and recommendations set forth in the Report. Specifically, the Court rejects the Magistrate Judge’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.