Kyle Handley v. Sean Moore

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 16, 20248:22-cv-01423California884 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10

11 KYLE HANDLEY, Case No. 8:22-cv-01423-MCS-GJS

12 Petitioner,

ORDER ACCEPTING IN PART

13 v. AND REJECTING IN PART

FINDINGS AND

14 SEAN MOORE, RECOMMENDATIONS OF

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE

15 Respondent. JUDGE 16 17 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the operative habeas 18 petition, (Pet., ECF No. 1), all relevant documents filed and lodged in this action, 19 the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge, (Report, ECF 20 No. 14), and Petitioner’s Objections to the Report, (Objs., ECF No. 17). Pursuant to 21 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b), the Court has 22 conducted a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which objections have 23 been stated. 24 Having completed its review, the Court accepts in part and rejects in part the 25 findings and recommendations set forth in the Report. Specifically, the Court rejects 26 the Magistrate Judge’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.