State Automobile Mutual Insurance Company v. Hyundai Motor America

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 18, 20248:23-cv-00439California643 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No. 8:23-cv-00439-JLS-JDE Date: January 18, 2024 Title: State Automobile Mutual Insurance Co. et al v. Hyundai Motor America et al

Present: Honorable JOSEPHINE L. STATON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Gabby Garcia N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter

Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendant:

Not Present Not Present

PROCEEDINGS: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE:

MISJOINDER

Rule 20 provides that “[p]ersons may join in one action as plaintiffs if: (A) they assert any right to relief jointly, severally, or in the alternative with respect to or arising out of the same transaction, occurrence, or series of transactions or occurrences; and (B) any question of law or fact common to all plaintiffs will arise in the action.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 20(a)(1). Rule 20’s “single transaction or occurrence requirement is not met where plaintiffs would have to prove their claims or defendants would have to litigate their defenses on an individualized…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.