Capitol Specialty Insurance Corporation v. A Plus Gutters Systems, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 19, 20242:23-cv-08507California490 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No. CV 23-8507-MWF (RAOx) Date: January 19, 2024 Title Capitol Specialty Insurance Corporation v. A Plus Gutters Systems, Inc., et al

Present: The Honorable: MICHAEL W. FITZGERALD, United States District Judge Rita Sanchez Not Reported Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder

Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendants: Not Present Not Present

Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

On December 5, 2023, Defendant A Plus Gutter Systems (“APGS”) Inc. c/o Israel Tanenbaum, submitted its Answer to Complaint (the “Answer”) for filing. (See Docket No. 17). The Answer reflects that Defendant APGS is proceeding pro se, without counsel.

Individual litigants may represent themselves pro se, but corporations and associations must be represented by a lawyer. See Church of the New Testament v. United States, 783 F.2d 771, 773 (9th Cir. 1986) (unincorporated association); In re Highley, 459 F.2d 554, 555 (9th Cir. 1972) (corporations). In addition, a partner may not represent his or her own interest in a partnership pro se, and a sole shareholder…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.