Tony Carrera v. D. Caviness

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 19, 20245:23-cv-00170California866 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2

3

4

5

6

7

8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

11 TONY M. CARRERA, Case No. 5:23-cv-000170-FMO (GJS) 12 Plaintiff,

13 v. ORDER DISMISSING ACTION

WITHOUT PREJUDICE

14 D. CAVINESS, et al.,

15 Defendants.

16 17 18 On January 30, 2023, Plaintiff filed a pro se civil rights complaint [Dkt. 1, 19 “Complaint”], which the named Defendants thereafter moved to dismiss [Dkt. 11, 20 “Motion”]. Following briefing, United States Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish 21 issued a Report and Recommendation, which found that the Complaint was 22 defective as a whole and should be dismissed, with leave to amend to be granted 23 only in two specified respects. [Dkt. 22, “Report.”] Plaintiff did not file Objections 24 to the Report. On November 20, 2023, the Court issued an Order accepting the 25 Report, granting the Motion, and dismissing the Complaint. [Dkt. 23, “November 26 20 Order.”] The November 20 Order advised Plaintiff that: if he wanted to have 27 this case proceed, he must file and serve a First Amended Complaint within 30 days; 28 and if he…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.