Giannella
Giannella v. Hanna
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1
JS-6
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SARAH GIANNELLA, Case No. 2:24-cv-00304-FLA (BFMx)
12 Plaintiff,
ORDER REMANDING ACTION
13 v.
14
BISHOY HANNA,
15 Defendant. 16
17 18 RULING 19 On January 12, 2024, Defendant Bishoy Hanna (“Hanna”) filed a Notice of 20 Removal, arguing this court has jurisdiction over three separate actions, all of which 21 Hanna claims to be related. Dkt. 1 (“NOR”). These three actions are: (1) Sarah 22 Giannella v. Bishoy Hanna, Los Angeles County Superior Court, Case No. 23 23SMRO00410 (the “First Action”); (2) Bishoy Hanna v. Josh Freeman Stinn, et al., 24 Los Angeles County Superior Court, Case No. 24STCV00037 (the “Second Action”); 25 and (3) Bishoy Hanna v. Sarah Giannella, Los Angeles County Superior Court, Case 26 No. 23STFL10014 (the “Third Action”). Id. 27 The court finds it lacks jurisdiction over any of the three actions. With respect 28 to the First Action, Hanna has failed to demonstrate a basis for federal jurisdiction. 1 The…