Giannella

Giannella v. Hanna

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 19, 20242:24-cv-00304California652 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

JS-

2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SARAH GIANNELLA, Case No. 2:24-cv-00304-FLA (BFMx)

Plaintiff,

ORDER REMANDING ACTION

v.

BISHOY HANNA,

15 Defendant.

17 RULING On January 12, 2024, Defendant Bishoy Hanna (“Hanna”) filed a Notice of Removal, arguing this court has jurisdiction over three separate actions, all of which Hanna claims to be related. Dkt. 1 (“NOR”). These three actions are: (1) Sarah Giannella v. Bishoy Hanna, Los Angeles County Superior Court, Case No. 23SMRO00410 (the “First Action”); (2) Bishoy Hanna v. Josh Freeman Stinn, et al., Los Angeles County Superior Court, Case No. 24STCV00037 (the “Second Action”); and (3) Bishoy Hanna v. Sarah Giannella, Los Angeles County Superior Court, Case No. 23STFL10014 (the “Third Action”). Id. The court finds it lacks jurisdiction over any of the three actions. With respect to the First Action, Hanna has failed to demonstrate a basis for federal jurisdiction. The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.