Alicia Esquivel v. Conrad Employer LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 22, 20242:23-cv-10821California597 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No. 2:23-cv-10821-JLS-SSC Date: January 22, 2024January 21, 2024 Title: Alicia Esquivel v. Conrad Employer LLC et al

Present: Honorable JOSEPHINE L. STATON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Gabby Garcia N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter

Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendant:

Not Present Not Present

PROCEEDINGS: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS

CASE SHOULD NOT BE REMANDED TO LOS ANGELES

COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT

Plaintiff filed this putative class action on behalf of herself and others similarly situated in Los Angeles County Superior Court, alleging that Defendant violated various California wage-and-hour laws. (Comp., Doc. 1-2.) Defendant removed, asserting that this Court has jurisdiction over this putative class action under the Class Action Fairness Act (“CAFA”). See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1332(d), 1441(a). (NOR, Doc. 1.)

CAFA requires, among other things, that the amount in controversy “exceed[] the sum or value of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.