Theresa Brooke v. Noble House Hotels & Resorts LP
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 THERESA BROOKE, No. 2:24-cv-00356-JAK (PDx) 11 Plaintiff, ORDER RE TO SHOW CAUSE RE: SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION v. OVER STATE-LAW CLAIM
NOBLE HOUSE HOTELS & RESORTS
LP, Defendant. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Based on a review of the Complaint (Dkt. 1), the following determinations are made: The Complaint alleges violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101 et seq. (the “ADA”), and the Unruh Civil Rights Act (the “Unruh Act”), Cal. Civ. Code §§ 51–53. Supplemental jurisdiction is the basis for the state-law claim. Dkt. 1 ¶ 6. District courts may exercise “supplemental jurisdiction over all other claims that are so related to claims in the action within such original jurisdiction that they form part of the same case or controversy under Article III of the United States Constitution.” 28 U.S.C. § 1367(a). This “is a doctrine of discretion, not of…