Theresa Brooke v. Noble House Hotels & Resorts LP

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 THERESA BROOKE, No. 2:24-cv-00356-JAK (PDx) 11 Plaintiff, ORDER RE TO SHOW CAUSE RE: 12 SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION v. OVER STATE-LAW CLAIM 13

NOBLE HOUSE HOTELS & RESORTS

14 LP, 15 Defendant. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 1 Based on a review of the Complaint (Dkt. 1), the following determinations are 2 made: 3 The Complaint alleges violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 4 U.S.C. §§ 12101 et seq. (the “ADA”), and the Unruh Civil Rights Act (the “Unruh 5 Act”), Cal. Civ. Code §§ 51–53. Supplemental jurisdiction is the basis for the state-law 6 claim. Dkt. 1 ¶ 6. 7 District courts may exercise “supplemental jurisdiction over all other claims that 8 are so related to claims in the action within such original jurisdiction that they form part 9 of the same case or controversy under Article III of the United States Constitution.” 28 10 U.S.C. § 1367(a). This “is a doctrine of discretion, not of…