V. G. v. CHA Hollywood Medical Center LP
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
JS-6 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Case No. 2:23-cv-8658-SPG-KS V.G., a minor, by and through her
Guardian ad Litem, MARTA OSORIO; ORDER GRANTING NON-PARTY
UNITED STATES’ AND PLAINTIFFS’
and MARTA OSORIO, MOTIONS TO REMAND [ECF NOS.
Plaintiffs, 19, 33]
v.
CHA HOLLYWOOD MEDICAL
16 CENTER, L.P. dba HOLLYWOOD PRESBYTERIAN MEDICAL CENTER; STEPHEN N. PINE, M.D.; and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive, 19 Defendants. 20 Before the Court is Non-Party United States’ Motion to Remand (ECF No. 19) and Plaintiffs V.G., a minor, by and through her Guardian ad Litem, Marta Osorio and Marta Osorio’s (“Plaintiffs”) Motion to Remand (ECF No. 33). Defendant Saban Community Clinic (“Defendant”) opposes both motions. (ECF No. 35). Having considered the parties’ submissions, the relevant law, and the record in this case, the Court finds pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 78(b) and C. D. Cal. L. R. 7-15 that the matter is suitable for resolution without oral …