V. G. v. CHA Hollywood Medical Center LP

1 2 3 JS-6 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Case No. 2:23-cv-8658-SPG-KS 11 V.G., a minor, by and through her

12 Guardian ad Litem, MARTA OSORIO; ORDER GRANTING NON-PARTY

UNITED STATES’ AND PLAINTIFFS’

13 and MARTA OSORIO, MOTIONS TO REMAND [ECF NOS.

14 Plaintiffs, 19, 33]

15 v.

CHA HOLLYWOOD MEDICAL

16 CENTER, L.P. dba HOLLYWOOD 17 PRESBYTERIAN MEDICAL CENTER; 18 STEPHEN N. PINE, M.D.; and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive, 19 Defendants. 20 21 Before the Court is Non-Party United States’ Motion to Remand (ECF No. 19) and 22 Plaintiffs V.G., a minor, by and through her Guardian ad Litem, Marta Osorio and Marta 23 Osorio’s (“Plaintiffs”) Motion to Remand (ECF No. 33). Defendant Saban Community 24 Clinic (“Defendant”) opposes both motions. (ECF No. 35). Having considered the parties’ 25 submissions, the relevant law, and the record in this case, the Court finds pursuant to Fed. 26 R. Civ. P. 78(b) and C. D. Cal. L. R. 7-15 that the matter is suitable for resolution without 27 oral …