Gonzalo J. Castillo v. Larry Art Martinez

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 24, 20242:21-cv-08736California1,502 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – WESTERN DIVISION 10 11 GONZALO J. CASTILLO, Case No. CV 21-08736-MEMF (AS) 12 Petitioner, ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, 13 v. CONCLUSIONS AND 14 RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED

LARRY ART MARTINEZ,

15 STATES MAGISTRTE JUDGE 16 Respondent.

17 18 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, all of the records 19 herein and the attached Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. After 20 having made a de novo determination of the portions of the Report and Recommendation to which 21 Objections were directed, the Court concurs with and accepts the findings and conclusions of the 22 Magistrate Judge. However, the Court addresses certain arguments raised in Petitioner’s 23 Objections below. 24 25 Petitioner asserts—for the first time, in his Objections to the report and recommendation— 26 several new grounds for federal habeas relief. Generally, a district…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.