Gonzalo J. Castillo v. Larry Art Martinez

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 24, 20242:21-cv-08736California1,502 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – WESTERN DIVISION 10 GONZALO J. CASTILLO, Case No. CV 21-08736-MEMF (AS) Petitioner, ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, v. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED

LARRY ART MARTINEZ,

STATES MAGISTRTE JUDGE Respondent.

17 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, all of the records herein and the attached Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. After having made a de novo determination of the portions of the Report and Recommendation to which Objections were directed, the Court concurs with and accepts the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge. However, the Court addresses certain arguments raised in Petitioner’s Objections below. 24 Petitioner asserts—for the first time, in his Objections to the report and recommendation— several new grounds for federal habeas relief. Generally, a district…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.