Lars Korsvall v. Samantha Penninger

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 26, 20242:23-cv-07538California876 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5

6 7

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

11 LARS KORSVALL, Case No. 2:23-07538-HDV (ADS) i 12 Plaintiff, c

13 v. ORDER DISMISSING ACTION FOR

FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND OBEY

14 SAMANTHA PENNINGER, COURT ORDERS

15 Defendant. 16 17 18 I. INTRODUCTION 19 Plaintiff Lars Korsvall, proceeding pro se, filed a Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 20 § 1983 (“Section 1983”). (Dkt. No. 1.) On September 19, 2023, the Court issued an 21 Order Regarding Service and Filing Requirements After Filing of Complaint by Pro Se 22 Plaintiff (“Order Regarding Service”). (Dkt. No. 5.) The Order Regarding Service 23 notified Plaintiff that he needed to file proof of service reflecting service upon Defendant 24 Samantha Penninger by no later than December 10, 2023. (Id. at 1.) Plaintiff took no 1 action. On December 20, 2023, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause Why Case 2 Should Not Be Dismissed for Failure to Prosecute and Obey Court Orders (“Order 3 Regarding Dismissal”). (Dkt. No. 6.) …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.