Miguel Hernandez v. Carlos Gerardo Alonzo

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 26, 20242:23-cv-10400California765 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES—GENERAL

Case No. _CV-23-10400-DMG (RAOx) Date January 26, 2024 Title Miguel Hernandez v. Carlos Gerardo Alonzo, et al. Page 1 of2

Present: The Honorable _DOLLY M. GEE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

KELLY DAVIS NOT REPORTED

Deputy Clerk Court Reporter Attorneys Present for Plaintiff(s) Attorneys Present for Defendant(s) None Present None Present Proceedings: INCHAMBERS— ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE COURT

SHOULD NOT DECLINE TO EXERCISE SUPPLEMENTAL

JURISDICTION OVER PLAINTIFF’S STATE LAW CLAIMS

The Complaint filed in this action asserts a claim for injunctive relief arising out of an alleged violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. sections 12010- 12213, and a claim for damages pursuant to California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act (“Unruh Act”), Cal. Civ. Code sections 51-53. It appears that the Court has supplemental jurisdiction over the Unruh Act, Disabled Persons Act, Health & Safety Code, and negligence…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.