Todd Michael Schultz v. Michael C. Thompson

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 30, 20242:23-cv-10759California1,802 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TODD MICHAEL SCHULTZ, No. 2:23-cv-10759-JAK (MRWx) 11 Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY PLAINTIFF SHOULD NOT BE v. DEEMED A VEXATIOUS LITIGANT 13 MICHAEL C. THOMPSON, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 On December 22, 2023, Plaintiff Todd Michael Schultz filed the most recent action in a series of complaints related to his disputes with Defendants Michael C. Thompson, Gregory R. Holmes, and YouTube LLC, although other defendants have included the judge and two members of judicial staff who participated in Schultz’s action in the California Superior Court against Thompson, Holmes, and YouTube. Plaintiff been repeatedly warned about filing plainly deficient pleadings and motions, but the stream of filings has continued unabated. For the reasons stated below, Plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why he should not be declared a vexatious litigant. Central District of California Local Rule (“L.R.”)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.