Todd Michael Schultz v. Michael C. Thompson

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 30, 20242:23-cv-10759California1,802 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TODD MICHAEL SCHULTZ, No. 2:23-cv-10759-JAK (MRWx) 11 Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY 12 PLAINTIFF SHOULD NOT BE v. DEEMED A VEXATIOUS LITIGANT 13 MICHAEL C. THOMPSON, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 1 On December 22, 2023, Plaintiff Todd Michael Schultz filed the most recent 2 action in a series of complaints related to his disputes with Defendants Michael C. 3 Thompson, Gregory R. Holmes, and YouTube LLC, although other defendants have 4 included the judge and two members of judicial staff who participated in Schultz’s action 5 in the California Superior Court against Thompson, Holmes, and YouTube. Plaintiff 6 been repeatedly warned about filing plainly deficient pleadings and motions, but the 7 stream of filings has continued unabated. For the reasons stated below, Plaintiff is 8 ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why he should not be declared a vexatious litigant. 9 Central District of California Local Rule (“L.R.”)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.