Jose Dolores Vargas v. Patwin Horn

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 31, 20242:23-cv-00201California230 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOSE DOLORES VARGAS, Case No. 2:23-cv-00201-MCS-PD

12 Petitioner, ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT

AND ADOPTING FINDINGS,

13 v.

CONCLUSIONS, AND

14 RECOMMENDATIONS OF

PATWIN HORN,

UNITED STATES

15 Respondent. MAGISTRATE JUDGE, AND 16 DENYING A CERTIFICATE

OF APPEALABILITY

17

18 19 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the 20 records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of United States 21 Magistrate Judge (“Report”). No objections to the Report were filed. The Court accepts the Report and adopts it as its own findings and conclusions. 22 Accordingly, the Petition is denied with prejudice. 23 Further, the Court finds that Petitioner has not made a substantial 24 showing of the denial of a constitutional right or that the court erred in its 25 procedural ruling and, therefore, a certificate of appealability will not issue in 26

27 28 1 2 || this action. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Fed. R. App. P.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.