Clara Gonzales v. Sanofi S.A.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaFebruary 7, 20242:23-cv-09299California289 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No. CV 23-09299-SPG-RAO Date February 7, 2024

Title Clara Gonzales v. Sanofi S.A. et al

Present: The Honorable SHERILYN PEACE GARNETT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Patricia Gomez Not Reported Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder

Attorneys Present for Plaintiff: Attorneys Present for Defendants:

Not Present Not Present

Proceeding: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER

Plaintiff(s) are ORDERED to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Link v. Wabash R. Co., 370 U.S. 626 (1962) (Court has inherent power to dismiss for lack of prosecution on its own motion).

The below time period(s) has not been met. Accordingly, the Court, on its own motion, orders Plaintiff(s) to show cause, in writing, on or before February 21, 2024, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. This matter will stand submitted upon the filing of Plaintiff(s) response. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78. Failure to respond will be deemed consent to the dismissal of the action.

Absent a showing of good cause, an action must be dismissed without prejudice if the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.