Yuri Doering v. Samuel Vasquez

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaFebruary 9, 20242:23-cv-09351California2,953 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

I. Background

25 A. Factual Background1 26

27 1 The factual allegations included in this section are taken from Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint. ECF 28 No. 15 (“FAC”). The Court makes no finding on the truth of these allegations and includes them only as 1 Plaintiff Yuri Doering (“Doering”) suffers from a physical disability, and requires a 2 wheelchair while traveling in public. FAC ¶ 1. Defendants are the owners or operators of a hardware 3 store (the “Business”) located at or about 3124 E. Gage Ave., Huntington Park, California. Id. ¶ 2. 4 In or about August 2023, Doering went to the Business. Id. ¶ 10. While attempting to enter 5 the Business, Doering encountered barriers. Id. ¶ 12. The Business does not have a parking space 6 designated for persons with disabilities, nor does it have signage indicating such a space with the 7 International Symbol of Accessibility, signage warning others not to park in the designated space, 8 proper paint on the ground for such a space, or proper van accessibility for such a space. Id. ¶ 13. 9 These issues deny Doering the full and equal access to the Business and deter him from visiting the 10 Business.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.