Warden

Valerie Wildman v. Warden

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaFebruary 12, 20245:24-cv-00092California2,994 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EASTERN DIVISION VALERIE WILDMAN, ) No. 5:24-cv-00092-MCS-JDE ) Petitioner, ) ) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE v. ) WHY THE PETITION ) UNKNOWN, ) SHOULD NOT BE ) DISMISSED Respondent. ) ) )

I. INTRODUCTION On January 5, 2024, Petitioner Valerie Wildman (“Petitioner”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se and seeking to proceed in forma pauperis, filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus on a California state form. Dkt. 1 (“Petition” or “Pet.”); Dkt. 3 (“IFP Request”). On January 23, 2024, the Honorable Mark C. Scarsi, United States District Judge, found Petitioner had not submitted enough information to determine whether Petitioner is able to pay the filing fee and postponed the IFP Request for 30 days so that Petitioner may provide additional information. Dkt. 5. Under Rule 4 of the Rules Governing…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.